Zimulti Acomplia News — Oct. 2007 — News About Rimonabant

Zimulti Acomplia News — Oct. 2007 — News About Rimonabant

Taranabant Yields Encouraging With ‘Generally Mild’ Side-Effects Taranabant, which a year from now may have surged past (Acomplia) rimonabant as the world’s most eagerly awaited made a low-key debut Oct. 24th when researchers reported that participants in a trial achieved encouraging with “generally mild” gastrointestinal and psychiatric side-effects.

A presentation by Dr. Ngozi Erondu, senior director of research for Merck, at The Society’s scientific meeting in New Orleans was the first official from Merck on trials of its which like rimonabant promotes by targeting Endocannabinoid System CB-1 receptors.

When Sanofi-Aventis, which had been trying for three years to get rimonabant (Acomplia -Rimonabant/ approved for U.S. sale, pulled back its application this summer after expert advisers voiced concern over psychiatric side-effects, many Americans waiting for the were very disappointed.

Now, it seems the high hopes of dieters for Acomplia (Rimonabant) may soon shift to the Merck as it appears increasingly possible that taranabant might beat rimonabant to the U.S. market.

While both Acomplia rimonabant and taranabant target CB-1 receptors of the body’s Endocannabinoid System, a complex signaling system believed to regulate energy balance, behaviors such as food intake, fear, and anxiety, and to modulate lipid and glucose metabolism, the drugs work in different ways.

An oversimplified explation would be that rimonabant, according to Sanofi, is a CB-1 receptor antagonist, meaning it blocks endocannabinoids — which would bind to the CB-1 receptors and trigger cravings for food — from reaching the CB-1 receptors.

Taranabant, according to Merck, is a CB-1 receptor inverse agonist, meaning (again oversimplified) that the binds to CB-1 receptors, and triggers a reverse action to the cravings that would be triggered by an agonist like endocannabinoids.

While the mechanisms of action differ, both drugs appear to result in significant

In their presentation of the Merck researchers reported that in a phase IIa trial involving 533 patients, “taranabant significantly reduced body and waist circumference compared to placebo” after 12 weeks of treatment.

“ Significantly more patients treated with taranabant achieved a of five percent or greater,” the researchers reported.

While “Acomplia” rimonabant produced greater in its longer phase III trials, reports we have received from participants in a phase III trial of taranabant with 2,400 participants — which has been underway for nearly two years — suggest the are comparable.

A Merck spokesperson said the company has no plans to present any data from the phase III taranabant trial until sometime next year, but the company obviously is highly encouraged because it reiterated that it plans to file for approval of taranabant in mid-2008.

But the big question on the minds of many experts watching the taranabant trials is whether the Merck has a better side-effect profile than rimonabant (Acomplia).

It was the side-effect profile of rimonabant (Acomplia) –particularly the incidence of depression and suicidality — that is keeping the off the U.S. market, even though Acomplia (rimonabant) is on sale in

Not many conclusions can be drawn in this regard from the phase II trial of taranabant. The researchers reported that the most commonly reported adverse events suffered by participants in the were gastrointestinal related, with about half as many suffering psychiatric

The gastrointestinal and psychiatric adverse effects were generally mild in intensity and self-limiting,”

the researchers added.

Some experts attending the Society meeting suggested that the difference between a CB-1 receptor antagonist and a CB-1 receptor inverse agonist may not be as important in terms of side-effects as the dose of the and the rsquo;s affinity to the receptor.

While Sanofi-Aventis tested a 5 mg dose in trials as well as the dose now on the market in the 5 mg rimonabant Acomplia dose produced disappointing

Merck’s taranabant, in contrast, is being tested in phase III at lower dosages with a 6 mg dose currently the highest.

I don’t think the amount of side-effects we have seen are related to the properties of the ” said Dr. Uberto Pagotto of the University of Bologna, an expert on the Endocannabinoid System. “Related to the dose, maybe, I’m not so sure, and to the affinity to the receptor. This is very important.


Метки:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Посмотрите также

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

Еще нет комментариев.

Извините, комментирование на данный момент закрыто.

News Acomplia Zimulti